All resourcesAsk HR AI · Minnesota

Pay transparency and pay equity in Minnesota.

Minnesota pay transparency and salary-history: banned (eff. 2024 for public employers; hf 2 for private 2025+ pending), posting requirements, and remote-worker triggers.

What changes in Minnesota

  • Salary-history rule: Banned (eff. 2024 for public employers; HF 2 for private 2025+ pending). Pay transparency law effective Jan 1, 2025 requires salary range and benefits in postings for employers with 30+ workers.
Try it now

"We post remote roles nationwide — how do we handle pay range disclosure? Focus on Minnesota."

Ask this in Ask HR AI

Practitioner steps for Minnesota

  1. Step 1. Confirm whether Minnesota bans salary-history inquiries — currently banned (eff. 2024 for public employers; hf 2 for private 2025+ pending).
  2. Step 2. Post a good-faith pay range on every MN job posting where required, including remote roles that could be performed in Minnesota.
  3. Step 3. Include benefits and equity where the MN statute or local ordinance requires them alongside the base range.
  4. Step 4. Retain the wage records and job description that support the posted range in case of an enforcement action.

Applicable Minnesota statutes and references

  • Minn. Stat. §364.021
  • Minn. Stat. §181.953
  • Minn. Stat. §609A
  • HF 100 (Cannabis Act)
  • 15 U.S.C. §1681 et seq. (federal FCRA)

Frequently asked (federal + Minnesota overlay)

Which states require pay ranges in job postings?

California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington all have posting or on-request pay range disclosure statutes, plus several cities with their own rules.

Can I ask an applicant about their current salary?

In many states, no. Salary-history bans in states like California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington prohibit asking about prior compensation, though applicants can voluntarily disclose.

What is a pay equity audit?

A privileged statistical review of compensation across protected classes for similarly situated employees, used to identify and correct unexplained gaps before litigation.

Related Minnesota topics

Same topic in another state

Keep going

Ask HR AI is not legal advice. Confirm any final answers or suggested actions with your employment legal counsel before acting on them.